CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Somewhere in the Future

To: Ward Silver <hwardsil@centurytel.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Somewhere in the Future
From: DGB <dwibos@netnet.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 21:22:56 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
... and surely not "serving the world to them on a golden platter" as 
they've become accustomed to, as the ARRL would like to do for the sake 
of increased numbers! Quality transcends quantity!

de W9YQ


Ward Silver wrote:
>> It's been quite apparent that the League has been focused on a perceived
>> future of ham radio that doesn't include much of what I know ham radio is
>> (was?) really all about.  I don't think I need to chronicle the evidence
>> here.
>>
>> 73, Bob W5OV
>>     
>
> I have a strong feeling that most aspects of ham radio will going to look 
> mighty different in say, 2020, than they do at the beginning of 2006.  This 
> is not because of some nefarious plot by the ARRL - it is because of 
> technology and demographics.  I know that the majority of us that form the 
> "pig in the snake" would like ham radio to stay pretty much like it was when 
> we got started in it, but I'm not going to bet any money that happening.
>
> Those of us that care about the survival of the ham radio principles we find 
> near and dear should be thinking about how to convince future hams that 
> those principles are, in fact, worth keeping as part of ham radio.  It's 
> about salesmanship and education.
>
> 73, Ward N0AX 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>   
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>