CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU
From: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:37:36 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
What Amateur map?

AFAIK, there has only ever been the ITU broadcasting zones as defined 
in the Annex to Appendix S1 to the Radio Regulations. The current ITU 
map, one having a total of 85 zones (75 "land" and 10 "water) was 
adopted at WRC-97 and went into effect 1/1/99 replacing the earlier 
version of the map that had a total of 90 zones (75 "land" and 15 "water").

If there's an "ITU map" out there that's unique to amateur radio, who 
is the authoritative source for that map? What organization drew and 
maintains the official version of this map, i.e. who decided that 
France is only in Zone 27, and not split between 27, 28 & 37 as is 
shown on the 1973 and 1999 versions of the map of ITU broadcasting 
zones in the RR?

73,
Mike K1MK

At 03:14 AM 6/30/06, Tim Makins wrote:
>The CIRAF Zone map is not the same as the Amateur one - CIRAF only have
>zones up to 84, whilst Amateurs go to 90.
>
>France is in Zone 27, not 28 or 37.
>
>73s Tim EI8IC
>http://www.mapability.com/ei8ic/maps/ituzone.html
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Frank Hunt" <zl2br@ihug.co.nz>
>To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 4:49 AM
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU
>
>
> > All those 3 maps show variations when compared to the ITU CIRAF
> > Broadcasting Zones map as published by the ITU:
> >
> > http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/terrestrial/broadcast/hf/refdata/maps/index.html
> >
> > The zone boundaries very rarely follow physical or political boundaries,
>many
> > countries are in multiple zones, ie. France is zone 27, 28 & 37 !
> >
> > Obviously this could lead to some confusion, so best guide would be to use
> > the table of ITU zones as shown on the ARRL web site:
> >
> > http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/prefixtable.html
> >
> > There is also an explanation of the zones for US and Canada:
> >
> > http://www.arrl.org/contests/vev0vy.html#wkna
> >
> > 73, Frank ZL4BR
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------
> > On 29 Jun 2006 Kenneth E. Harker wrote:
> >
> > >      So, there have been several posts referencing maps or lists of
> > > information about ITU zones:
> > >
> > > JF9EXF: http://www4.plala.or.jp/nomrax/ITU/
> > > ICOM:   http://www.icomamerica.com/downloads/WorldMap_ITU_LR.pdf
> > > K3RXK:  http://www.spacetoday.org/k3rxk/ITUzones.html
> > >
> > > There are incosistencies between these sources in a few places, and
>mostly
> > > it is the ICOM map that seems to be in error:
> > >
> > > * ICOM and JF9EXF show the boundaries between zones 1 and 2 as longitude
> > >   139W, which would put some of KL7 in zone 2, but the K3RXK description
> > >   says all of KL7 is in zone 1.
> > >
> > > * The ICOM map shows the boundary between zones 7 and 8 to be longitude
>92W.
> > >   JF9EXF and K3RXK shows the boundary to be the Mississippi River with
>all
> > >   of Louisiana and Minnesota in zone 7.
> > >
> > > * The ICOM map shows the boundary between zones 18 and 19 as longitude
>30E.
> > >   JF9EXF and K3RXK shows the boundary to be the political boundary
>between
> > >   Finland (OH) and European Russia (R).
> > >
> > > * The ICOM map shows Nigeria (5N) in zone 47, but JF9EXF and K3RXK put
> > >   it in zone 46.
> > >
> > > * The ICOM map shows the boundary between zones 55 and 59 as latitude
>29S.
> > >   JF9EXF and K3RXK agree that all of South Australia is in zone 59, not
> > >   zone 55.
> > >
> > > Did I miss anything?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
> > > kenharker@kenharker.com
> > > http://www.kenharker.com/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

Michael Keane K1MK
k1mk@alum.mit.edu

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>