Nothing will get you off that, Bill.
How about the big vs. little antenna system, hard line vs. crappy coax, number
of miles from the Atlantic in DX contests, number of miles from the Northeast
in Domestic contests (not sure what the best number for that is, but it sure
isn't 0), good rigs with filters vs. tube rigs, etc, etc.
Ed N1UR
-----Original Message-----
>From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
>Sent: Jul 29, 2006 10:01 PM
>To: sawyered@earthlink.net
>Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs. SO2R
>
>ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
>On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:17:35 -0400 (GMT-04:00), you wrote:
>
>
>>So please, can we get off of the SO1R vs SO2R thing....
>
>------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------
>
>Shall we also get off the HP/LP thing? The SO/MO thing? The
>assisted/unassisted thing?
>
>Those operations were separated into their own classes because each
>one had a *significant* advantage/disadvantage over the other.
>
>One radio/two radio has a similar significant difference and should be
>treated the same.
>
>Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|