----- Original Message -----
From: "Zoli Pitman HA1AG" <ha1ag@hg6n.hu>
.
.
> Remote operation is already a reality, we just have to learn to take
> most benefits out of it and how to incorporate it into our technology
> and traditions. It will stay just as packet stayed.
I agree remote control is a reality. All I'm trying to
do is put down a marker for controlling and regulating
it for the purposes of contesting and award chasing.
I maintain, and I know the remote-control enthusiasts
may disagree, that a QSO is a person-to-person entity,
as are telephone or VOIP calls. Further, the only
thing that distinguishes an amateur radio QSO from
other "QSOs" is that we use RF all the way - nothing
else makes sense.
Inexpensive person-to-person, world-wide communications
used to be an exclusive benefit of being a radio amateur.
Now it's available to anyone. How then can we expect
others to take us seriously when we substitute RF with
the internet.
The only benefit I see from remote control is the fun
element. Of course I'd enjoy being at the sharp end
of a pileup in the Indian Ocean while sitting at home.
Saves a lot of time and money. That's fine for my own
selfish enjoyment, but the dogs in the street can see
it's not kosher. I could even work myself :-)
For contesting and award chasing, you have to "be there".
Didn't someone named Don Miller run into a little problem
in this respect?
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|