And get better propagation! Conditions on 40m from OK to TX were terrible
this weekend, and I am too close to work them on 20.
73s John AA5JG
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Thompson" <k5zd@charter.net>
To: "'Eric Hilding'" <b38@hilding.com>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 12:41 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY
> The CQWW RTTY Contest has truly become a major event on par with the Phone
> and CW versions. Activity is growing every year.
>
> I suggest the TQP think about moving to a different weekend! I would love
> to work them, but the RTTY contest is more fun.
>
> Randy, K5ZD
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> > [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Eric Hilding
> > Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 2:21 PM
> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY
> >
> > Methinks there needs to be some "Gentleperson's Agreement"
> > put in place to dispense with the major problem of CQ RTTY
> > stations thrashing the Texas QSO Party on 40m.
> >
> > Like, keep 7.047 to 7.053 (at least) free for the
> > Distinguished Contesters from Texas to also enjoy their
> > event. RTTY on 40m was down to about 7.025 on Saturday
> > morning, with the #&^! Chinese Woodpecker wreaking havoc here
> > up to 7.020 which left only 5Khz for any kind decent CW on 40m.
> >
> > FWIW & 73...
> >
> > Rick, K6VVA
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|