| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs |
| From: | "doug smith" <dougw9wi@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:09:42 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
We don't want to publish the raw logs because someone might find a call similar to theirs in the log & use it to claim a QSL for a QSO they didn't make. We want to publish the raw logs because it might prove that someone is using packet when they claim they aren't. Does either of these situations happen enough to be worth worrying about? With operators within "spitting distance" of Honor Roll? With operators within "spitting distance" of the Top 10 box? Who really cares if someone cheats their way from 44th place to 39th? If they inflate their DXCC total from 137 to 140? Are we debating an issue that really doesn't exist? == Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View, TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs, Peter Voelpel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Battle of the Cheaters, Hershel Kreis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs, Zack Widup |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs, Joe Subich, W4TV |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |