CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer musings

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer musings
From: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:50:21 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> [*] Am I the only one who thinks that outlawing or categorizing
> automated receiving technology, while allowing all manner of automated
> transmitting technology, is logically inconsistent?

Dealing with automated reception differently than automated transmission is 
appropriate because only reception can initiate a QSO; whether in response 
to a solicitation (CQ) or from tuning to a solicitation (S&P).  Reception is 
qualitatively different in this regard than transmission.

73, Ward N0AX 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>