| To: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>, "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted? |
| From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
| Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:33:38 -0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> Some people like to think, "If it > ain't specifically stated I can't do that, I guess I can." > > 37 > Tom W7WHY > New rule, Tom. "Everything not specifically prohibited is mandatory." 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Stan Stockton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Mark Beckwith |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted?, mike l dormann |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted?, Zack Widup |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |