To: | "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted? |
From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net> |
Date: | Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:21:01 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Zack wrote: > But you are always going to get a certain minimum percentage of cheaters > in any endeavor who don't see anything wrong with it at all. The minimum > percentage by actual measurement is about 2 or 3 percent. I think a lot of time people don't actually set out to cheat, but to see just how far they can push the rules. Some people like to think, "If it ain't specifically stated I can't do that, I guess I can." 37 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Skimmer Rule Challenge, Mark Beckwith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: Why have different classes at all?, Marty Durham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted?, Zack Widup |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Eliminate SO Unassisted?, David Kopacz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |