This is fantastic! Now, can the skimmer network be used to calculate the
average time it takes for a CQ-ing station to ID?
73, Denis - K7GK> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:26:17 -0500> To:
CQ-contest@contesting.com> From: n4zr@contesting.com> Subject: [CQ-Contest]
Answering an age-old question> > The most recent CQWWCW contest was the first
in which the Reverse Beacon > Network (http://skimmer.dxwatch.com) was using
version 1.3 of CW Skimmer, > which reports the signal-to-noise ratio of
stations received by each > Skimmer-equipped beacon station. It dawned on us
that this offers, for the > first time, the opportunity to answer the age-old
question, "Whose [signal] > is bigger."> > Some examples:> > Skimmer Freq. Call
Date/Time SNR> SV8RV-2 | 7008.1 | N3RS | 2355z 30 Nov | 4> SV8RV-2 | 7018.2 |
KC1XX | 2352z 30 Nov | 4> SV8RV-2 | 7006.3 | W3LPL | 2348z 30 Nov | 4>
...> or> 73, Pete N4ZR> the World Contest Station Database is back...>
www.conteststations.com
_________________________________________________________________
Send e-mail anywhere. No map, no compass.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_anywhere_122008
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|