CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers

To: N7DF <n7df@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] serial numbers
From: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:57:56 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This is what the rules say:

 Exchange: RS(T) report plus a progressive contact serial number
starting with 001 for the first contact

A progressive serial number. Is that the same as a sequential number, or not?

Ryan, N2RJ


On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:41 AM, N7DF <n7df@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have noticed that there is no requirement in the WPX rules for serial 
> numbers to be sequential, only that they begin with 001
>
> Reminds me of the school kids chant "one two skip a few, forty four, skip 
> some more"
>
> Nothing against foxing out the competition by skipping ahead occasionally to 
> give numbers larger than them.
>
> N7DF
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
Ryan A. Jairam,
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>