CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Disruption of Emergency Communication during CQWW SSB c

To: "Ryan Jairam" <rjairam@gmail.com>, "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Disruption of Emergency Communication during CQWW SSB contest
From: "John Geiger" <aa5jg@fidmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:16:45 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Compromise might not have been the best word, maybe accommodate would be 
better.  Do the Encom people rely on the WARC bands much?  They should. 
That should be figured into their plans, as they wouldn't have to contend 
with contest QRM.  Do they have access to several modes, like CW, RTTY, 
other digital modes, in addition to SSB?  They should, as most of those 
modes work better than SSB under marginal conditions.

I agree with Hans and others, emergencies involving the loss of life and 
property should always take priority over contests and other non-life 
threatening activites, but I also agree that reality and "should" don't 
always mesh.  That is why looking for non-contest occupied places to operate 
would be a good plan for the encom people.

73s John AA5JG
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ryan Jairam" <rjairam@gmail.com>
To: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Cc: <cq-contest@contesting.com>; "Andreas Kretzschmar" <9y4w@gmx.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Disruption of Emergency Communication during CQWW 
SSB contest


Utopia is lovely.

Unfortunately reality is here, and reality says that no matter how
many times you tell people to QRX, some people simply will not listen.

So you come to a reasonable compromise, where emergency comms can have
their frequencies clear without as much QRM from contesters, or anyone
else for that matter.

This is one of the reasons why having mode restrictions in the US is
still a good thing.

One of the reasons for lobbying for the 60m band as well was to have a
nice regional band for emergency comms.

So your choice, either you yell at people to behave, or find a way to
work within the system.


73
Ryan, N2RJ

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Not apologizing for QRM but I think that both contesters
>> and emergency comms folks can come to a reasonable
>> compromise.
>>
>> 73
>> Ryan, N2RJ/9Y4RAJ
>
>
> I respectfully disagree.
>
> Emergency communications involving safety of life and property should NOT
> compromise. It should have absolute right of way.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
> "Just a boy and his radio"
> --
> Proud Member of:
> A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
> MWA - http://www.W0AA.org
> TCDXA - http://www.tcdxa.org
> CADXA - http://www.cadxa.org
> LVDXA - http://www.lvdxa.org
> CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
> SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
> TCFMC - http://tcfmc.org
> --
> Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.spaces.live.com/
> Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
> All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
> LoTW participant
>



-- 
Ryan A. Jairam,
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>