CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?

To: burbidge terence <terryburbidge@blueyonder.co.uk>, somata90924@mypacks.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?
From: "Gerry Treas, K8GT" <k8gt@mi.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:01:22 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ahhh, but do you notice how many people DO stop at a stop sign?  Of course not. 
 The human brain is wired to notice exceptions, not the commonplace.  Then, of 
course, we apply the exception as if it is the rule.

Most people do abide by the rules, but who notices them?

Sounds like the first caveman after we came out of the trees, "grumble. . 
.don't know why we have to live in a cave, the trees were plenty good for our 
ancestors.  Changes. . whole world is going to the dogs, if you ask me. . ."

Thanks for claiming that I'm not honest.

73, Gerry, K8GT




---- somata90924@mypacks.net wrote: 

=============
if people would be HONEST WE WOULD not have to be bothered by all 
this,,skimmers,,internet, cheaters, SPOTS,,,,,bahhhhhh humbug.  Guess we have 
lost that as a society, ever watch how many people never STOP at a STOP SIGN?

joe w6vnr/zf2ah

-----Original Message-----
>From: burbidge terence <terryburbidge@blueyonder.co.uk>
>Sent: Mar 18, 2011 7:21 AM
>To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?
>
><<I would describe recordings, whether of a whole
>band or from individual stations, as technology
>which inherently inhibits cheating, in contrast
>to some other technologies which facilitate
>cheating.>>
>Great idea. Perhaps we could employ a firm of forensic experts to replay and
>report on the recordings? Even simpler, let's set up a 'Star Chamber' of
>distinguished contesters to investigate. Not just cheating but also
>behaviour. For example, start/stop the clock when an SO2R/VFO leaves his run
>frequency to make Q elsewhere and someone like me jumps in and steals it.
>
>Maybe take the Star Chamber findings to the International Court, complete
>with the 'usual suspects' who could then be interrogated and eventually
>tried for their offences.
>
>For goodness sake!
>
>Cheers,
>
>Terry
>G4MKP
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>