Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted

["Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>]

Joe   I don't know how somone would get caught , however If you were 
checking a Log you might find a station is running on 14005 at a really good 
rate then suddenly for one contact of 20 seconds makes a contact on 14065 of 
a needed mult, an then is back on 14005 CQing 25/30 sec, later.  Now I know 
that some operate  SO2R and are really good and could work this in but  ???
If I find this many times in a log I'm gonna look at the log VERY, VERY 
carefully.
Rex K7QQ



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted


> On 1/29/2013 10:09 AM, Hal Kennedy wrote:
>
>  The point I'd like to make is there are really three categories: - SO - 
> SO (A) - SO (cheating A) We don't know too much about how the scores of 
> the third category stack up, but knowing of a few stations that do it 
> routinely, and who have been caught and penalized in some cases and STILL 
> continue to do it,
> I  have yet to operate Assisted.  Hey I just recently started to use a 
> computer to log.  But i am curious, as to how does on that is claiming SO, 
> but does SOA, how do they actually get caught?
> Joe WB9SBD
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> ____________________________________________________________
> Visa&#174 Black Card&#8482
> Earn 25,000 Bonus Points Plus Get Exclusive Rewards&#58 Apply Now&#33
> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3265/51095aa164cff5a9b3c54mp01vuc
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest