CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Extended Line Score - Hours Worked

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Extended Line Score - Hours Worked
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 23:06:36 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

I've always thought that a single large public file representing the merged data from all submitted logs would offer all kinds of interesting statistics ... some fairly simple scripts could probe the data for almost anything. All of the logs are there, and the folks who manage pileup.ru have obviously compiled their own master database anyway. Actual callsigns wouldn't even have to be used ... each callsign could be converted to a unique entry number and treated as text.

73,
Dave   AB7E



On 4/1/2013 6:02 PM, Ward Silver wrote:
By publishing the number of hours worked with the score, using whatever time-on calculation the log-checkers feel is appropriate for that contest, it would be straightforward for an interested third-party to calculate score/hr statistics.

Public, validated logs could also be parsed for all sorts of time-related stats:
- best first 24 hour score
- best second 24 hour score
- best N hour score
- fastest to N points
and so on. It would be the equivalent of baseball's sabermetrics - what is the analog of "slugging percentage"?

If the data was there and someone cared about the calculation, it would probably be performed. We might find an interesting way to compete that doesn't require a new formal category. Or we might decide that what we already have is good enough and that more categories don't really change things. Nevertheless, the impact on the contest sponsors, who have very limited resources, would be minimal.

73, Ward N0AX

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>