"Penalties" are for lawbreakers and sinners.
You farkle up a QSO, you don't get credited with the Q. What could be
simpler?
You want a penalty, break the 6th Commandment!
73, Hans, K0HB
On Thursday, May 23, 2013, Bill Tippett wrote:
> I noticed this from today' s The Daily DX:
>
> >During the Contest forum at Dayton last weekend CQ WW DX Contest
> Director K5ZD, Randy Thompson, did an interesting presentation on the
> best contest in the world, the CQ World Wide. He mentioned several
> changes that will take place starting this year. The busted QSO
> penalty will change from the removal of three QSOs to the removal one
> (sic...
> probably meant to be "of") two. In addition the CQ WW Contest is working
> on new DQ criteria for dirty signals (i.e. wide signals, etc.). Full
> details are
> expected to be announced well before the contests.
>
> I'm surprised there's been no discussion of the busted QSO penalty change.
> Was
> this the decision endorsed by the full committee? IMHO this is one of the
> unique features of the CQ WW that encourages logging accuracy. Changing
> the penalty from 3 QSOs to 2 may seem insignificant but it potentially
> violates the integrity and consistency of past records, which I feel should
> not be done without careful consideration and discussion.
>
> I applaud the move to DQ based on dirty signals. With the advent of SDR
> spectrum recordings, I hope this can be enforced.
>
> 73, Bill W4ZV
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a boy and his radio"
--
Sea stories at --------> http://K0HB.wordpress.com
Superstition trails ---> http://OldSlowHans.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|