CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

To: Bob Schreibmaier <k3ph@ptd.net>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: Mladen Bogdanov <mladenbogdanov@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Mladen Bogdanov <mladenbogdanov@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 09:59:55 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Too much guessing!!!

If your practice is to wait 5 mins or more,for 'Might be a mult' non ID 
station, in WPX contest,where every 3rd station is potential mult.....?!
Well,GL with your score!

73,Mladen YT6W



On Saturday, February 1, 2014 10:53 AM, Bob Schreibmaier <k3ph@ptd.net> wrote:
 
Because I might need him, maybe for a multiplier.
>You don't know until you try.
>
>>Why did you call him at all if you didn't know who you were calling?
>
>-- 
>+----------------------------------------------+
>| Bob Schreibmaier K3PH | E-mail: k3ph@ptd.net |
>| Kresgeville, PA 18333 | http://www.dxis.org  |
>
>+----------------------------------------------+
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>