RUMLog uploads directly to LoTW either via email or https and to eQSL.
73, Mike NF4L
On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Scott <cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I use fldigi for digital, which uploads directly to RUMlog if it is open, and
> use MacLoggerDx for some contests. None of them upload directly to LoTW, but
> do so to eQSL. However, each produces adif files. RUMlog, where everything
> ends up, links with the ARRL program to provide tq8 files that I upload
> manually to LoTW.
>
> It is much easier to do than it sounds and easier to do than explain! Only
> one time did a file fail to upload, but it was because of a poor internet
> connection.
>
> 73, Scott AA0AA
>
> Sent Scott's iPad
>
>> On Feb 11, 2014, at 6:29 PM, Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> My Winlog32 does the eQSL thing automatically.. it does NOT do LOTW auto..
>> far from it.
>> IN FACT.. I have not been successful with LOTW in well over two years.
>> IF winlog32 or any logging program.. like N1MM would do the LOTW auto.. I'd
>> be plumb happy...
>> and so would a whole lotta other folk too. (the ones that need a WY
>> confirmation).
>>
>> Have a great day,
>>
>>
>> --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:25:35 -0800
>>> From: cq_dx_de_aa0aa@yahoo.com
>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com; rtty@contesting.com
>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates
>>>
>>> I am about 47% confirmed on LoTW and much lower on eQSL (although not
>>> calculated, country list is shorter). DX (outside NA) confirms more often
>>> on LoTW, and, over all, digital QSOs are confirmed much more often on eQSL.
>>> NA contacts confirm more often on LoTW or both. Digital contacts are
>>> confirmed overwhelmingly on eQSL.
>>>
>>> 73, Scott AA0AA; XE1/AA0AA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: "Ktfrog007@aol.com" <Ktfrog007@aol.com>
>>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com; rtty@contesting.com
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:49 AM
>>>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here's my observation of relative mode confirmation rates in LoTW and
>>>> eQSL:
>>>>
>>>> JT65 > PSK > RTTY > CW > SSB > FM
>>>>
>>>> It sort of goes along with computer skills and maybe age.
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently running 49.5% confirmed in LoTW. If I took out all the old
>>>> QSOs from 1960-1999 I'd be well over 50%. I think this is remarkable and
>>>> partly explains why LoTW seems to run so poorly now - it's a victim of
>>>> it's
>>>> own success. A lot of my confirmations come from digital and RTTY QSOs.
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>> Ken, AB1J
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In a message dated 2014-02-10 8:59:24 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
>>>> tshoppa@wmata.com writes:
>>>>
>>>> Many of these QSO's are already confirmed in LOTW (hint, RTTY contesting
>>>> has extremely high confirmation rates in LOTW).
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|