| To: | sm6lrr@gmail.com, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Your Dec 12 post to CQ-Contest |
| From: | Marvin Bloomquist <n5aw@281.com> |
| Reply-to: | n5aw@arrl.net |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:06:06 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Mat,Your December 12 post addressed the assisted vs. unassisted issue very elegantly. I completely agree with you. I hope the committee will reconsider it's decision. Marv N5AW -- Marvin Bloomquist Burnet, TX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?, Trent Sampson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Unassisted, SK?, Oliver Sweningsen |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Contesting without spotting, Mark Simms |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Unassisted, SK?, Oliver Sweningsen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |