CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores
From: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:54:05 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
As of my latest count, there were over 40 "reports" for the Russian DX contest from North Ameroican stations.

Probably not 100%, but not shabby.

Remember, reporting in the 3830 reflector is optional.

72/73 de n8xx Hg
QRP >99.44% of the time

On 3/22/2015 12:00 PM, Rick Dougherty NQ4I <nq4i@contesting.com> wrote:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:14:24 -0400
From: Rick Dougherty NQ4I <nq4i@contesting.com>
To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Posting Scores

I cannot believe what I have been seeing and hearing this RDXC!! Hundreds
of stateside signals and not hardly a one posting a score...I feel very
strongly that if you USE the technology to have packet, or skimmer
assistance, then you should post your score! The UA hams have done a really
wonderful job in their website..it keeps getting better and better...

My hat is off to the following: W8CAR, AA3B, K3IT, W3LL, W6AWW, N3MX, K3ZU,
N3BNA, and W1KM for posting their scores for all to see! What a go
gentlemen!

So, How about it guys....post, or don't use packet and skimmer!

NQ4I

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>