Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

[Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent

To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: [Karlnet] Karlnet vs Lucent
From: Blair Drew Davis <theory@datawise.net>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:31:40 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Recently, with assistance from Ed at Karlnet, we found a work around for a for a latency and packet loss issue.

We operate a geographically large wisp in Allegan, MI. We use Lucent hardware for our towers and backbones, and various suppliers for our cpe.

We have a mix of standard lucent software and Karlnet flashes.

Using Karlnet Turbocell 4.43 as a COR in master mode to talk to a Lucent ROR 4.15 in slave mode we get high latency, limited bandwidth and high packet loss. Placing the COR into non-polling mode fixed this, but limits this to a point to point link, not a point to multi point.

Moving our equipment around has allowed us to have Lucent talking to Lucent and Karlnet talking to Karlnet in most areas.

However, my question is, will a Lucent ROR/COR in master mode talk to a Karlnet ROR in slave mode without the latency, bandwidth, and packet loss problems?


-- Blair Davis Computer Adjusters of Allegan www.computeradjusters.com (616) 673-0054

AOL Instant Message Screen Name theory240




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>