I know its "the other" software but look at the cw keyer at www.writelog.com
; reading the description it looks like its cw only but appears to control
sending/headphones/antennas all for 2 rigs. I dont own one but found this
while browsing....73 Jamie WW3S
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Crim" <k4ab@email.msn.com>
To: "k8cc" <k8cc@mediaone.net>; "David Robbins" <k1ttt@berkshire.net>;
<na-user@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: [na-user] Re: [CQ-Contest] so2r switch box
>
>
> >I know WX0B is planning to offer a SO2R box. Although he claims NA
> >compatibility, I've not seen any details. Its likely this will be an
> >expensive box - not that Jay is a crook, its just that low volume niche
> >products like this are expensive to make. While building your own takes
> >time, there might be a lot of $$$ to save
>
>
> I'm just glad that someone stepped up to plate and finally did it. I
think
> there *is* a market for this device. Perhaps, yes, not a huge
> money-maker...But I, for one (as I've told before you Dave, when you were
> here at this QTH) would be happy to pay the bucks to save the time.
>
> And if Jay incorporates both a voice keyer and CW interface...what a
hit!
>
>
> 73,
> Larry K4AB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: k8cc <k8cc@mediaone.net>
> To: David Robbins <k1ttt@berkshire.net>; na-user@contesting.com
> <na-user@contesting.com>
To: <na-user@contesting.com>
> Date: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 19:54
> Subject: [na-user] Re: [CQ-Contest] so2r switch box
>
>
> >
> >At 08:57 PM 8/7/00 +0100, David Robbins wrote:
> >>does anyone make a so2r switch box like the schematic in the back of the
> >>NA user
> >>manual?
> >
> >Dave,
> >
> >There are plans afoot to be able to offer a bare PCB for the NA SO2R box.
> >
> >Long time readers of this reflector will scoff at this, because I've been
> >saying this for over a year. We had a small run (5 pieces) of boards
back
> >in 1997 which wound up going to W4AN, K3MM, N4AR, K9TM and K8CC (now at
> >W8MJ). The board worked perfectly - as W4AN said "You can't tell its in
> >the line on your SSB signal". However, it used chassis-mounted
connectors
> >which made for a lot of hand-wiring. One goal of the new design is to
use
> >all PC-mount connectors which will speed up assembly time.
> >
> >K9TM and I have been brainstorming the new configuration, and have a new
> >configuration going on paper. Here are connectors we're thinking of:
> >
> >Function Connector
> >----------------------------------- ---------------
> >Radio audio in, headphone audio out 1/8 mini stereo
> >Radio PTT out, PTT in RCA phono
> >Radio mic out, mic in 1/8 mini mono
> >Radio key out, key in RCA phono
> >Paddle in 1/4 stereo
> >LPT in ribbon cable to DB-25
> >
> >If anyone has any suggestions, now is the time. Since I gave away my
> >original box, I now have new impetus to make this project happen before
the
> >fall.
> >
> >I know WX0B is planning to offer a SO2R box. Although he claims NA
> >compatibility, I've not seen any details. Its likely this will be an
> >expensive box - not that Jay is a crook, its just that low volume niche
> >products like this are expensive to make. While building your own takes
> >time, there might be a lot of $$$ to save.
> >
> >73,
> >
> >
> >Dave Pruett, K8CC
> >DATOM Engineering
> >datom@contesting.com
> >http://datom.contesting.com
> >
> >
> >--
> >Submissions: na-user@contesting.com
> >Administrative requests: na-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
> >WWW: http://datom.contesting.com/
> >Questions: owner-na-user@contesting.com
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> Submissions: na-user@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: na-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
> WWW: http://datom.contesting.com/
> Questions: owner-na-user@contesting.com
>
--
Submissions: na-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests: na-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW: http://datom.contesting.com/
Questions: owner-na-user@contesting.com
|