On Tue, 23 Dec 2008 01:35:53 -0600, Jim P wrote:
>because, it underscores
>the need for a 'static-electricity drain path' to earth; the
>NEC may be seeking in their usual round-about way
>to provide this, albeit without outright stating so (in the
>vein of 'Rules without explaining the Rationale').
Why are you beating up on NEC? It's a very good safety code.
It is not a textbook. You want to learn how things work and
why the code is written the way it is, you study a textbook.
73,
Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|