RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops.

To: "David Robbins" <k1ttt@arrl.net>, <Rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops.
From: "Kenneth G. Gordon" <kgordon2006@frontier.com>
Reply-to: kgordon2006@frontier.com
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:20:42 -0700
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On 28 Mar 2014 at 11:39, David Robbins wrote:

> Not good for long distance, but gives good nulls.

That was the info I was wanting: "good nulls". Thanks.

>From my reading on loops over the years I had "remembered" that a 
shielded loop was necessary for good nulls.

Glad to know my memory is faulty.

A shielded loop would be easy to make out of coax, but there is the interface 
from the balanced loop to the unbalanced input to the receiver to consider.

Ken W7EKB
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>