LOL!!. We have Dish network here along with Comcast for internet, never had
any problem with RF in or out and I operate all bands except 30 and 160 at max
power when needed. Your neighbor probably needs new feed line from the dish
antenna to the TV.
Dale, k9vuj
On 23, Apr 2014, at 18:18, "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net> wrote:
> I have a 3L Steppir on a 50ft tower with a hazer.....as soon as I put the
> antenna up, I had interference complaints from the neighbor....never mind the
> fact I didnt have a transmitter connected....due to high winds, at times I
> crank the antenna down, to abt 18ft.......I can operate all day and night
> with that antenna cranked down (it’s aimed right at my neighbors satellite
> dish) and never get a complaint, but crank the antenna up, and the phone
> rings, “are you on the air, my tv is breakingup” (and no, I’m not on the air
> when that happens)....
>
>> On 4/23/2014 5:39:34 PM, Rob Atkinson (ranchorobbo@gmail.com) wrote:
>>> All well and good working with ARRL and neighbors but hams need to
>> grow spines and quit tucking their tails between their legs and
>> capitulating to neighbors who due to irrational psychology, seem to
>> think watching TV or some other appliance use is a birthright, but ham
>> radio is just an optional play-time activity with some toys.
>>
>> This comes out for example with antennas, and the deplorable use of
>> hidden "stealth" antennas to appease neighbors, as if the ham is in
>> the Resistance in WW2 or is engaged in some illegal activity, or has a
>> spy station. It is exceedingly disappointing that the use of these
>> antennas is promoted in ham magazines such as CQ and QST, complete
>> with glowing reports of satisfied owners, as if these are excellent
>> and satisfactory antennas in the fullest sense. If I were counsel
>> representing plaintiffs against a ham, all I would need to do is round
>> up dozens of these articles and present them to a jury and I'd easily
>> win. I am absolutely nonplussed every time QST or CQ hands
>> municipalities yet another article to use against us. Every one of
>> those articles should carry a prominent disclaimer to the effect that
>> these antennas are most unsatisfactory and are only presented to be
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|