RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] Update 9/30/16 Solar Panel RFI @ K2MO

To: rfi@contesting.com, Jim Spears <n1nk@cox.net>
Subject: [RFI] Update 9/30/16 Solar Panel RFI @ K2MO
From: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 20:10:59 -0400
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
All:

Here's the latest update on the solar panel RFI emanating from my neighbors home. The SolarEdge system was installed by Solar City on the 8th of August this year.

On September 12th, Solar City informed me that the RFI case was in the hands of SolarEdge, the company who makes the solar system.

On September 29th, I received an email from the installers System Monitoring Tech which said the manufacturer, SolarEdge, has been dragging their feet; the only response for the past 3 weeks has been "the case is being reviewed".

He went on to say that he will present the case to his supervisor to see if Solar City can solve the problem themselves. His plan is to apply the suppression techniques provided by Tony Brock-Fisher's QST article (April, 2016).

Another option would be to install a system that does not use Optimizers which seems to be the major cause of RFI. In closing, he said he wasn't sure if the responsibility of eliminating RFI lies with his company or the manufacturer, Solar Edge.

It seems logical to me that that the responsibility would lie with the installer if the installation was found to be at fault, while the manufacturer would be responsible if the device doesn't meet FCC standards.

Can anyone clarify the responsibility issue? Is there a case where the manufacturer and / or installer were held responsible for causing RFI?

73, Tony -K2MO

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>