Yep.... and some enterprising young ARO/write should take up the editor
reins and put all of Jims various works into a multichapter, high-speed,
low-drag, illustrated manual. And PROOFED by Jim before it gets
published..... because mistakes happen.
My opinion..... worth what you paid for it. <smile>
73,
Clay E. Autery, Jr.
KY5G
On 7/17/2024 9:52 PM, Dave (NK7Z) wrote:
I agree with Jim fully on this, he is the gold standard on Chokes...
73, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
https://www.nk7z.net
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
ARRL Technical Specialist, RFI
ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources
On 7/17/24 19:41, Jim Brown wrote:
On 7/17/2024 2:31 PM, Ken Gordon wrote:
I can find mix 43 and mix 71 beads, but so far, no mix 31. I even
tried eBay.
Hi Ken,
Dave and I have been good friends and collaborators for years, but I
strongly suggest that you study my work on HF chokes. His advice to
use #43 for HF suppression is wrong. While Dave has done a lot of
excellent work on identifying, chasing, and fixing RFI issues, my
work on chokes is FAR more extensive (since 2004) that any solid work
I've seen published. And the guys at Palomar don't have a clue --
they're just selling stuff.
k9yc.com/publish.htm
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|