RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] HF-2V or HF-6V

To: radioman@frpd.org
Subject: Re: [RTTY] HF-2V or HF-6V
From: af2c@njdxa.org
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:10:18 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I may be partial, but have found that the Butternut Antennas perform very well and have performed well under the most adverse conditions for DXepeditions and personal use.

My secondary antenna is an HF9V here is Florida and have used it for all modes. It has withstood many hurricanes over the past decade.

The Gap antennas reportedly have mixed reviews. You question has been posed on one the DX reflectors a number of times.

Cushcraft Verticals are OK when it comes to ease of assembly, Field Day but all more of a compromise antenna than the others.

73,
jay

At 10:32 PM 2/13/06 -0500, you wrote:


This is most likely not the list for this, BUT

anyone had any luck on RTTY with either? HF-2V or the HF-6V,
ive been looking for a vertical for the second station, but

Gap/Butternut/Crush craft?
so many and what are the ups and downs,
so many listings on the web, with a lot of back patting, its like a guess..

Tony
NN1D

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.7/259 - Release Date: 2/13/06


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.7/259 - Release Date: 2/13/06
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>