RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] CQ QRM

To: Ed <k4sb@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] CQ QRM
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:33:22 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:04:12 +0000, Ed <k4sb@comcast.net> wrote:


>So, who takes the blame? The ARRL for putting RTTY on 160 so low in
>the band. We can solve our own problems by simply ignoring the band
>plan and go to traditional frequencies from 1.8 up.

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

If by "traditional frequencies" you mean 80 kHz up from the lower band
edge, that would be fine with me for North America, but there is a
problem with the frequency allocations for some regions of the world.
I don't have a good answer for this... wish I did.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>