I may have been one of the few SO-ONE-R operators with a high score. I
didn't have to spend time worrying about band changes or getting stuck on a
dead band.
Whenever I felt a band needed a rest or I needed a rest I changed bands.
Some day I will try SO2R, maybe when I grow another brain.
Susan K5DU
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com> wrote:
> Dick, K7VC, asked:
> > Why are the Single Operator scores consistently higher in
> > their categories than the M/S scores? That would seem
> > counter-intuitive.
>
> There are a number of reasons, but the fundamental reason is that the rules
> practically guarantee a SO will have a higher score than a MS given the
> same
> station, same location and same operator skill. The MS rules restrict the
> station to 6 band changes per clock hour whereas the SO is only restricted
> to having one signal on the air at a time. Therefore, the SO has a
> potential QSO rate of 2x the MS since they can alternate QSOs between two
> bands. The MS is effectively inhibited from transmitting on another band
> while they are receiving on one band.
>
> It is counter-intuitive, but it is also a reality of the classic MS rules.
> I argue that a MS should be able to operate at least as effectively as a
> SO,
> i.e., SO2R, and that the MS band change restriction should be replaced with
> an operator change restriction. That is, the operator cannot change more
> often than, say 10 minutes.
>
> Ed - W0YK
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|