RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users

To: "rtty@contesting.com" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users
From: Michael Rapp <mdrapp@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:41:28 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Hi Jeff,

Being fairly new to ham radio I may have mis-heard this, but the use case I
keep hearing about in my local area is to send a large Excel spreadsheet
over HF via Winlink to an served-agency email address in an emcomm
situation.

I do not understand the technical details at all, but the impression I have
is that the Pactor IV protocol is supposed to make this use case more
reliable, more efficient, and/or faster.  Or at least that is my perception
from people who seem positive or indifferent towards the ARRL proposal.

Again, I'm a little hesitant as I'm so new to ham radio but the impression
I've gotten is that the ARRL proposal is to -- somehow -- help remove some
of the impediments to sending large file attachments over Winlink, but I
don't understand the technical details enough to say how it does that, so I
could be completely wrong.

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jeff Blaine <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>wrote:

> The guys promoting the winlink/pactor 4 stuff keep talking about improved
> emcom support.  But I'm not sure how these two items tie together.
>
>
73,
-- 
/*/-=[Michael / KT5MR]-=/*/
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>