Your exact words were
"But again allow me to point out that for some time now these stations
have
been in their own sub band."
The phrase "in their own sub band" could certainly be construed as a sub
band to which unattended stations have exclusive access.
The word "suggestion" is equally false; the FCC has never suggested that
the
97.221 subbands be exclusively used by unattended stations. On the
contrary,
the FCC explicitly stated that these subbands are to be *shared* among
attended and unattended stations.
You've been posting these falsehoods for years. They remain false,
none-the-less.
Is there no way to advocate your position without employing falsehoods?
-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of John Becker
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 6:33 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Pactor 3 demo
Demonstrably false. Nowhere in part 97 are unattended stations in
the US
granted exclusive access to any frequency or set of frequencies.
Unattended stations are expected to share frequencies with attended
stations; among other things, that means confirming that the frequency
is clear before transmitting.
No where in my post did I say or mention the word "EXCLUSIVE"
You sure do love to nit pick everything I say.
Would the word "suggestion" work better with you all mighty.
JAB
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty