RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Interesting quote ...

To: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>, RTTY contest group <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Interesting quote ...
From: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:59:17 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
You could always ask your directors for clarification, there's a board meeting Jan 15-16 by the way. It is a bit odd though, all the references to protecting narrow band just don't make
sense......yet.

Ron K0IDT



On 1/12/2016 6:54 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
“ARRL has analyzed the regulatory limitations as part of a comprehensive
effort to make more efficient the use of those HF allocations, especially
with respect to encouraging further experimentation and proficiency in
**narrowband digital communications technologies**,”  (my emphasis)

http://www.arrl.org/news/view/arrl-asks-fcc-for-minimal-but-necessary-changes-to-correct-reapportioning-error


I thought we were supposed to be "harmonizing" all the HF bands at the
otherwise unique bandwidth used on 60 m?   Which is it?




_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>