RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad?

To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] FSK is bad?
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:07:39 +0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:23:25 +0000, Thom wrote:

>
>Uh, I was always under the impression that transmitted bandwidth is 
>determined in digital modes by the data rate rather than power output.  
>The "dirtier" the digital signal the greater bandwidth generated.  Am I 
>wrong?

REPLY:

The basic RTTY signal is a carrier, frequency modulated by a square
wave, and if the corners of the square wave are really "sharp", the
harmonic content is high.  A square wave is rich in harmonics. FM
always produces sidebands and the "clicks" you hear are just the
harmonics of s sharp-cornered square wave. Electronics 101. If you can
"round off" the corners a bit, harmonic content is greatly reduced.
But don't go too far - a sharp cornered square wave contains the
greatest energy at the "top" of the wave and is easiest to detect.
There is a tradeoff. 

I wouldn't call an un-rounded square wave "dirty" exactly, it's just
obeying the laws of physics. To me, "dirty" is when you overdrive an
amplifier into compression, producing severe IMD. 

Semantics.

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>