SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Fwd: [CAC-I:403] CAC Study Area #3 - Kickoff package

Subject: [SECC] Fwd: [CAC-I:403] CAC Study Area #3 - Kickoff package
From: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:28:40 -0400
On 8/26/01 1:29 AM, Steve at SteveWS4F@aol.com wrote:

>PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED CHANGES:
>
>PhaseI-3-1:
>
>Permit an individual operator's score to be split between two clubs in
>which the operator meets all membership criteria (residence and
>attendance standards). One of the two clubs must be in the Unlimited
>Class and one in the Medium. (This process may be difficult to manage
>since a Medium Class club may not know how many logs have been submitted
>and may not remain in the Medium Class.) The individual's score will be
>equally divided between the two clubs.

This rule is complicated. 

>PhaseI-3-2 
>
>This proposal is the same as PhaseI-3-1with the ability to define the
>allocation of the score between the two clubs. 

This one is also complicated, but the defined allocation would tend to 
allow gerrymandering of club scores.

>PhaseI-3-3
>
>Permit an individual operator's score to be divided equally between any
>two clubs in which the operator meets all membership criteria (residence
>and attendance standards).

This proposal makes the most sense. I wouldn't limit it to two clubs. In 
effect, an eligible operator can split his score between any club to 
which he meets all membership criteria. However, the effect of his 
submission of a score becomes diluted for each club he adds.

>PhaseI-3-4 
>
>This proposal is the same as PhaseI-3-3 with the ability to define the
>allocation of the score between the two clubs.

Simple, but too likely to cause gerrymandering of scores. Keep it simple.

>WHAT TO DO:
>
>Review and ponder the enclosed material. Jim Pratt made a well-framed
>comment earlier today on this topic. Please submit any ideas on how to
>address the concern. To keep things straight, identify any new proposal
>with a name that contains your callsign and a sequential number (keep a
>track of your own numbers?I have plenty to do).

Steve, one other issue: what about M/M or M/S operations? How are they 
split? Are they ineligible? Are they ineligible if any part of the team 
doesn't meet the membership criteria?



Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
            -- Wilbur Wright, 1901



--
SECC on the Web:          http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions:              secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-secc@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>