TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] OMNI 6+ or FT1000MP

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ or FT1000MP
From: ai2q@ispchannel.com (Alex Mendelsohn)
Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 22:14:25 -0400
Where are you folks looking at Halliscratchers receivers? I have an SX-99
sitting here.

        Vy 73, AI2Q, Alex in Kennebunk, Maine .-.-.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-tentec@contesting.com [mailto:owner-tentec@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of John/K4WJ
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 1999 9:13 PM
> To: Steve Ellington N4LQ; Paul Christensen; tentec@contesting.com;
> yaesu@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6+ or FT1000MP
>
>
>
> At 04:29 PM 5/8/99 -0400, Steve Ellington N4LQ wrote:
> >
> >I think the SX-99 is the best looking think on the bench Paul.
> >Steve N4LQ
>
> I don't thing so Steve. Me things the Omni VI is better looking
> and me also
> things that is a SX-100 es not a 99, or maybe even a SX-101.
>
> :-)
>
> (I couldn't resist it Steve..the Thing thing that is, after you said it is
> the "best looking think on the bench"
>
>
> 73..de John/K4WJ
> **********************************************
>         John/K4WJ in Pembroke Pines, FL
>      QTH is 26 00 51 N
>             80 16 16 W
>      K8PXG from 18 Jun 59 to 11 Feb 97
>      K8WJ  from 12 Feb 97 to 07 Apr 97
>      ZF2HZ from 17 May 84 to 31 Dec 84
> **********************************************
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
> Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
> Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
>
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>