TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] More About Clix

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] More About Clix
From: jtgwin@home.com (J T Gwin)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:39:43 -0600
So, where does a fellow go to sign up for this ear training?  I want a
trained ear, too, so I can critique folk's Pegasus/Jupiter signals.
To think that all this time, I have been telling these self-same people
that their signals sound great on-the-air.

Struggling with an untrained ear, I remain....

-W4SK

----- Original Message -----
From: <n4lq@iglou.com>
To: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>; "Paul Christensen"
<paulc@mediaone.net>; <tentec@contesting.com>; "Carl Moreschi"
<n4py@earthlink.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] More About Clix


> The "digital" sound is sometimes hard to detect to the untrained ear. It
> seems to show up best during either deep fades when phase distortion
> enhances it or when the signal is very strong. Switching back and forth
> between a normal cw carrier and the Peg, one can detect the difference.
> I'm convinced that most people just write it off to band conditions.
> As for getting on-the-air reports, generally, they are worthless. There's
> only a few operators who will critique a signal and give a critical
> report.
>
> Considering your QTH Jim, I doubt if anyone would ever notice the fuzzy
> sound much less report it! After all, they want that QSL OM.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jim Reid" <jimr.reid@verizon.net>
> To: "Paul Christensen" <paulc@mediaone.net>,
> <tentec@contesting.com>, "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@earthlink.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:53:27 -1000
> Subject: Re: [TenTec]  More About Clix
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Per the ARRL test of the Pegasus,  Feb. 2000 QST,  it appears
> > that both the rise and fall time of the CW keying is somewhere
> > near 2.5 or 3 mSec,  up and down.  Have looked through the
> > Pegasus.doc of the N4PY software,  and find no way to adjust
> > the envelope;  is this true,  what the ARRL shows is what we
> > get?  Be fun to adjust if possible to repeat some of the experiences
> > being reported in this thread.
> >
> > Note:  no one yet has said that my Pegasus CW note sounds
> > "digital",  hi.  Say it sounds "just fine".
> >
> > 73,  Jim  KH7M
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>