TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Argo, Jupiter, Pegasus, RX320 overload

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Argo, Jupiter, Pegasus, RX320 overload
From: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:23:46 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Removing the bypass capacitor will also improve the linearity of the amplifier. The attenuator will not.
73
Bill wa4lav


At 07:34 AM 7/23/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Good morning.

George, thanks for your comments about removing the source bypass resistor (I should have said CAPACITOR)
from the 1st IF JFET amp in my RX-320 to cut down the front end gain.

A resistive attenuator in the antenna input will do about the same. Anything
that lowers the front end gain or input signal level will boost the IMDDR3
by the same amount.

73/72, George
Amateur Radio W5YR -  the Yellow Rose of Texas

I have used the attenuator approach, but it reduces the noise figure or minimum discernable signal of the receiver. The big advantage of reducing the gain with the approach that I mentioned is that while the dynamic range and 3rd order intercept are improved, the noise figure is not degraded much. While the use of the front end attenuator will increase the 3rd order intercept, it degrades the noise figure by the amount
of attenuation and does not improve the dynamic range.

Regards,
Jack, KE4ID
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>