TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] code speed

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] code speed
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:34:07 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Isn't it just amazing that in the middle of a world war, someone could
bother to be upset by "4Q"  ?

Maybe in between machine gunning people and dropping bombs on them ?

Sheesh.

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <w8au@sssnet.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 11:21 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] code speed


> At 06:28 PM 1/14/07, Curt Gamble wrote:
> >Another funny incident on a Navy practice cw circuit in Norfolk in mid
> >60's some operator sent the following.
> >"Mississippi sissies are sissier than Tennessee sissies" as fast as
> >possible. They called all the logs in so they could
> >figure who sent it and this individual got a few demerits on that
> >one.
>
> An associate of mine who was an Army radio op during WW2 said that
> they occasionally signed off with "4Q."  To which the other op would
> reply "4Q2."   This upset the monitors who sent messages to all
> commands to cease this activity. :-)
>
> I don't recall ever hearing that the Navy ops did this...   Either
> the Army ops were cruder, or the Navy ops weren't as creative... :-)
>
> w8au
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>