TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Fw: Ten-Tec gear for sale

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Fw: Ten-Tec gear for sale
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:19:59 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
If it doesn't say PLUS on the front panel then it isn't a Plus.  Don't sell 
it as a Plus, don't say it's a Plus 'cause it ain't a Plus.

73
Bob, K4TAX

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <kartooo@comcast.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Fw: Ten-Tec gear for sale


>I agree 100%. My plus has "plus" printed on the front and is a model 564 
>not 563. they are worth more on the used market.
>
>
> Larry  /N1YW
>
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: k8vf_mark@centurytel.net
>
>> Send it back.
>>
>> The guy should be chastised for false advertising. Make him pay shipping
>> BOTH WAYS. He should be ashamed.
>> ANYONE who sells an option 3 as a PLUS (without disclosing the fact) is
>> trying to cheat you.
>>
>> Yes, I know Ten Tec says they are ELECTRICALLY the Same, but the fact
>> remains that their VALUE is different.
>>
>> Guys, dont put up with this stuff and let us know who did it!
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>