In a message dated 11/19/2008 4:21:51 P.M. GMT Standard Time,
k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com writes:
>The O II meets my current needs, and I do not consider the K3's incremental
>performance improvement to be worth trading rigs for.
I agree -- unless you're a VERY serious contester. :)
Which, for the record, I'm not. I am, however, a serious DXer, on CW and a
little RTTY. I hardly ever operate phone.
It may seem strange to some, but I actually like the general coverage
sub-RX. It's nice for Armed Forces Day, and for keeping up with the fun
activities
of the Maritime Radio Historical Society. The sub-RX performance on the ham
bands has been good enough for what I use it for, which is spotting callers
in pile-ups. I suppose, however, that if I were a serious contester I would
want the K3's sub-RX over the O II.
73 Ray W2RS
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|