Steve and Barry,
After studying the schematic for a while, I think L1, L2, L3, L4, L7,
L8 are all 100 uHy and not 100 mHy. First, 100 mHy inductors are huge
devices and second that large of value is not needed for the circuits in
questions. I also question L11, L12. I suspect they are also wrong and
should be in uHy. If I have missed any, please let me know. Barry, after
you compile all the changes to the Corsair II manual, maybe you could
publish it with the corrections? If you have a scanner, you could just scan
the pages that have problems, put them up on the web as a .PDF and then be a
hero to all of us with Corsair IIs. ;-)
Jerry W5JH
"building something without experimenting is just solder practice"
-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve Hunt
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 4:34 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] FW: Corsair vs Corsair II
Barry,
I can't say for certain - I didn't lift them to measure!
They are the same style of component as L5, and clearly the values can't be
8.2mH as shown. It seems likely the same sort of error has been made, but
whether they are 8.2uH or 820nH I'm not sure. If I get a chance tomorrow
I'll take another look at them.
I guess a quick calculation around those LPF component values -
C24/L9/C25/C26 - might also resolve it.
73,
Steve G3TXQ
On 13/03/2013 21:26, Barry N1EU wrote:
> Steve, are L9 and L10 equal to 820nH (0.82uH), and not 8.2mH as indicated?
>
> I've been compiling a Corsair II manual errata so just want to make sure.
>
> thanks & 73,
> Barry N1EU
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> wrote:
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|