To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: Stew Perry QRP Operation |
From: | n6wg@earthlink.net (Bob Tellefsen) |
Date: | Wed, 26 Dec 2001 09:24:19 -0800 |
I'm looking for some opinions. I'll be operating QRP in this contest, as I do in all the 160m cw contests. My question is about the new QRP QSO bonus in the rules. As it stands, there is no way for a station to know if his QSO is with a QRPer or not. There is no Q precedence for an indicator. Are there any strong feelings one way or the other about a QRPer signing /QRP when calling? Will this be a help to others, or just be seen as a plea for special consideration? I'm comfortable either way. 73, Bob N6WG |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: EU topband condx from W7 12-26-01, Dinsterdog@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: N7UA long path in UA4., Andrey Markelov |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: EU topband condx from W7 12-26-01, Dinsterdog@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | Topband: N7UA long path in UA4., Andrey Markelov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |