Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Top Loading Summary

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Top Loading Summary
From: herbs@vitelcom.net (Herb Schoenbohm)
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 12:47:35 -0400
Dear Fellow Topbanders:

After miserable performance with my  shunt 76 foot Rohn 25G (like 
calling a 599 RA6AX for an hour and a half without a contact) I sent an 
e-mail to this reflector about my amazement with the enhanced 
performance by just adding the 26 foot aluminum boom on the top of the 
tower. He is a short summary of the results of various changes:  (Thanks 
to the many amateurs who offered suggestions and tips and especially 
Earl,  K6SE who did some extensive "what if" modeling  as well as Dave, 
WX7G who sent me a 3-D current distribution model of the tower and boom. 
The shunt feed is #6 stranded spaced at 18 inches and tapped at the 35 
foot level.  Guys are insulated from the tower.

1) As mentioned before the addition of just a 26 foot horizontal boom to 
the top of the tower turned the antenna from non player to a player. 
 The need for an L network to match the shunt wire disappeared just as 
Earl predicted from his model.  With just the added boom alone I was 
able to get a 1:1 VSWR at 1.890 kHz with just the series vacuum 
variable.  The antenna became to perform on the air as well.  No more 
endless calling of strong Europeans.  The suggestion by some that this 
was due to conditions is not the way I see it.  Now I appeared to be a 
first layer station working most everyone in Europe on the first call 
and receiving 599, 589, 579 reports.  This was not how it was for a 
month prior but has been the case since the top loading changes were 
made. The tower alone was fair to NA but essentially useless to Europe.

2)  As the 204BA elements (Hy-Gain 20 meter 4 element monobander) were 
added the resonant frequency appeared to drop accordingly.  with just 
three elements added (outside director, reflector and driven element) 
the apparent low VSWR point dropped to 1.860

3) adding 4 130 foot #14 insulated radials to the existing system caused 
the VSWR to rise slightly probably due to lowering the amount of series 
ground loss resistance.

4) adding the inside director to the 204BA and sliding the beam up two 
feet on the mast to the 78 foot level cause the VSWR dip, without 
retuning the vacuum variable, to exist at 1.830Khz.

5) The usable bandwidth has increase from 20Khz (with the L-Network) to 
about 125 Khz with the straight series feed.

6) The performance of this antenna is now very positive. Bob, G4VGO gave 
me a no kidding 599 plus 20 dbs this week!  I have worked RA6AX on the 
first call every night now and before the top loading I could not get 
him at all.  (He came back to me as K1FZ once and called me Bruce and 
the QSL is on the way!)

7) If a beam is not available for top loading I would strongly urge the 
top set of guys to be attached to the tower and insulated about 35  feet 
down the wire to provided some top loading.  An inverted L, which is a 
standard approach was not favored because of the pattern distortion and 
high angle waste.  if loading wires are used they should be exactly the 
same length with the tower supporting like a T.  If three or four equal 
length wires are used for this purpose, like spokes in a wheel, their 
overall length can be reduced somewhat.

8) The real world performance started to agree with Earl's model when I 
provided him with greater details.  He even took into consideration 
tower rungs.  I spared him having to factor in his NEC calculation for 
analysis an 80 meter inverted bottom fed Delta loop hung by a rope from 
the same tower.  When I lowered the Delta loop to the ground the low 
point VSWR went up about 8 to 10 Khz. So even proximity slopers and 
dipoles can change the apparent tower resonance. They can, I believe 
also reradiate or provide some cancellation of preferred radiation.

9)  I had not set up a field strength meter as I should have.  However 
there is one thing I can tell you and that is my East running 500 foot 
Beverage now shuts down the RX protection circuit on the Icom when I am 
transmitting.  I think that helps substantiate the fact that their is 
more current along the ground than before, right?

Thanks again to all those who helped with their suggestions and adivce 
in this antenna project. (KB5NJB, ZL3IX, WX7G, AJ1H, AA1K, WI5A, W8WEJ, 
VE3CSK, K1XT, and of course Earl K6SE whose modeling took out a lot of 
guessing and tower climbing. I think I am in the ballpark now closer to 
home plate and not way out in left field with this antenna.


73

Herb, KV4FZ
St. Croix, VI



 



.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>