Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: RE: IMD On FT-757 & FT-747GX VS FT-840 Etc

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: RE: IMD On FT-757 & FT-747GX VS FT-840 Etc
From: kn4lf at tampabay.rr.com (Thomas Giella)
Date: Tue Jun 24 15:11:51 2003
  My QTH is in a suburban high signal environment with powerful broadcast band 
stations nearby. I have a 50 KW station on 1010 kc approximately 4 miles to my 
WNW, a 10 kw station on 760 kc approximately 5 miles to my NW modulating above 
100% and a 5 kw station on 910 kc approximately 2 miles to my WNW.  
  In this high signal operating environment I have owned an FT-101E, FT-747, 
FT-757, FT-840, FT-990 and a TS-830. The FT-747 and FT-757 produced horrendous 
signal overload and IMD on 160 meters, suprisingly the FT-990 produced a 
moderate amount of signal overload and IMD and BUT the FT-840, FT-101E and 
TS-830 produced none. 
  I am considering buying an FT-1000MP Mark 5 Field and recently borrowed one 
to try out at this QTH. It also performed with no overload and IMD on 160. The 
FT-1000MP Mark 5 Field will be my main rig, with the FT-840 used as a back up 
for the next 160 DX season. It seems that preselection on the front end of a 
tranceiver as well as fewer internal RF amps. is a good thing.

73,
Thomas Giella, KN4LF
Plant City, FL, USA
EL87WX
 
KN4LF 160 Meter Amateur Radio Resources & More:
http://www.kn4lf.com/kn4lf.htm
 





---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 6/18/2003
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>