To: | topband <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Topband: Ground mounted 1/2 and 1/4 wave verticals (was GAP) |
From: | Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com> |
Date: | Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:32:43 -0600 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
It seems to me that a 1/2 wave monopole would need longer radials than a 1/4 wave vertical to help accomplish that. The point of current max on radials under a 1/2 wave ground-mounted vertical would be farther out on the radials than if the vertical were 1/4 wave. 73, Mike www.w0btu.com On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:23 PM, DAVID CUTHBERT <telegrapher9@gmail.com>wrote: > > What we do in the near-field to control ground loss ... > _______________________________________________ It is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatsoever for supposing it is true. — Bertrand Russell |
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Ground mounted 1/2 and 1/4 wave verticals (was GAP), Shoppa, Tim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Ground mounted 1/2 and 1/4 wave verticals (was GAP), W2RU - Bud Hippisley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: Ground mounted 1/2 and 1/4 wave verticals (was GAP), Bill Aycock |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: Ground mounted 1/2 and 1/4 wave verticals (was GAP), W2RU - Bud Hippisley |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |