There was a thread about this very subject not long ago. When I also
mentioned "below 1810", I was quickly informed by several here that it's
just 'not going to' or 'can't' happen because of --among other things-- the
lack of 1800-1810 in one region.
BTW, I think this is the last day to comment on the ARRL's wider bandwidth
digital modes proposal.
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Tree <tree@kkn.net> wrote:
> I would say that the band is big enough for all of us. We just need some
> coordination so we can get along. There are some open issues on 160 that
> have not been totally resolved (like the activity on 1838 kHz for
> example). I guess my first comment would be to try to move this out of the
> 15 kHz JA window. I would not have a problem with it below 1810 kHz.
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|