To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: K levels and skew path on 160 |
From: | "Steven R Daniel, D.D.S." <nn4t@comcast.net> |
Date: | Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:18:13 -0600 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I was rereading the article by Cary Oler and Ted Cohen (N4XX), published in 1998, which provided a good primer for understanding, as much as we can, propagation on Topband. In one section the impact of a high K index on the auroral oval, and its subsequent impact on signals passing through the oval, was discussed. My question is does the K index, especially at higher levels, impact the SW or SSW skew path many of us were trying to use this morning to work Ken, XW4ZW? Any information or observations will be appreciated. Best, Steve, NN4T _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: Elimination of Treadmill RFI on 160 meters, Don Kirk |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: Pulleys for antennas in trees, Mel Crichton |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Non Invasive Tree attachment., Doug Turnbull |
Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: K levels and skew path on 160, Tom W8JI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |