Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: NE7D loaded tower

To: "160" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: NE7D loaded tower
From: "Ron Feutz" <feutz@wctc.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:09:05 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Let the log checkers know and let them figure it out. After all, even Magellan was a day late.

Ron KK9K

-----Original Message----- From: Tree
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 10:26 AM
To: 160
Subject: Re: Topband: NE7D loaded tower

Thanks for all of the comments about the possible hazards associated
with the floating elements of the SteppIR and loading the tower as a
vertical.

Unless I missed something - I don't believe anyone has actually seen a
failure with them however (due to loading a tower as a vertical).

Two points have sort of crystallized in my mind about this:

1. There will be less stress on the electronics if the elements are
retracted.  This is pretty obvious to me.  As the element gets longer
- it becomes a lower impedance to "ground" and will create more
voltage stress compared to the boom and associated components that are
at the same voltage as the boom.

2. Likely - having 70 foot wires running from the top of the tower for
loading is helping the situation.  The SteppIR is not at the very end
of the antenna and therefore the highest voltages are not present.
The highest voltages will be found at the ends of the wires.

I'll report any failures that we find to this list.

I do have one question about remote operating...  if I am on an
airplane using this station during a contest - and travel over the
international date line - what date do I put in the log?

73 Tree N6TR

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com> wrote:
Yeah, but you grounded the elements to the boom, which makes a bad thing
into a good thing. :)




----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>
To: <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: NE7D loaded tower


Well, just to contradict all the nay-sayers who replied to this post, I
would like to say that I have been using my SteppIR 3-element as top loading for 11 years without the slightest hint of a problem. I did, however, take
the precaution of grounding all the elements to the boom before ever
applying any RF.  On the parasitic elements I soldered a wire to the mid
point of the brush, fed it out through a hole I drilled in the bottom of the
motor housing, and connected it to the boom.  On the driven element I
soldered a wire to the ground connection of the balun, and again fed it
through a hole and then on to the boom.

I did post some photos of these modifications on the SteppIR user group in
2005, but they have probably been archived by now.

There was absolutely no detectable change in the antenna behaviour after
these modifications. I checked SWR and observable F/B quite carefully, and
there was no discernible difference between before and after.  (I was not
expecting there to be any).

Not only does the antenna add good top loading, but it is quite neat to be able to tune the match to different parts of 160, simply by changing band on
the SteppIR.

73, Greg, ZL3IX


On 2015-01-30 06:07 a.m., Tree wrote:

I spent yesterday loading NE7D's tower on 160 meters and thought I
would share the results here as a data point.

His tower is about 75 feet of Rohn-25 with a SteppIR DB18E on top.
You can see a picture of it here:

http://www.kkn.net/~tree/misc_pictures/NE7D-DB18E.jpg

Rocky put down about 15 radials and I spent the afternoon trying
different gamma match attach points.  We had a 600 pf variable cap at
the base.  My initial attach point was around 55 feet - which in the
end - might have been just fine - but was not producing any good
results initially.  I moved it down to around 45 feet and still had no
luck.

My next step was to put a loading wire on top of the tower.  I made
one about 55 feet long and this did change things.  I did find I had a
very nice 80 meter antenna now - being able to move the resonant point
most anywhere on 80 I wanted.  I then increased the length of the
loading wire to about 65 feet and put a second one up going the
opposite direction.  I also put a gamma attach point up around 65 feet
and tried that.  The results were better - as I was able to get a good
match around 2.1 MHz - but not lower.  I decided to increase the
loading wires out another 12 feet or so - probably bringing them close
to 75 feet each - but things were still not very good.
Just for fun (or out of desperation) - I hooked up the 45 foot gamma
match wire again - and VOILA!!  I was able to get a 1.2:1 SWR anywhere
I wanted at the bottom of the band.  The 1.5:1 SWR points were about
20 or 25 kHz away from the sweet spot.

So - my conclusion - even with the SteppIR stretched out to the 20
meter position - it is not offering much in the way of top loading.
Perhaps there is a way to modify it to connect the parasitic elements
to ground to help with this - but this might be tricky as this model
allows any of the 3 elements to be driven.

Our gold standard was a wire Rocky had up in the trees that he was
using on 160 meters previously.  It was actually a pretty good looking
antenna - with about 70 feet vertical and then some similar length
horizontal..  The new antenna seems to be a couple of S-units better
so far - so I think it is working as it should.

I hope this information proves to be useful for others.  Keep an ear
out for an improved signal from NE7D on topband.

Tree N6TR
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4800 / Virus Database: 4257/9022 - Release Date: 01/29/15


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>