Good morning. I have followed with interest the discussion on this subject. I
enjoyed hearing both sides of the issue from my fellow DXers. Most of the
replies have been both thoughtful and respectful and I thank you for that.
I thought you may find it interesting to hear a comment from the perspective of
an RHR user. Perhaps some of the others who comment also used that service
(which seems to have triggered this debate) but I don't remember seeing that. I
have been an RHR customer for two years. I have been a DXer for the entire 42
years of my amateur career. Climbing the DX Challenge ladder is my principal
goal. I have a home station focused on 6, 80 and 160. 93.5% of the entities I
need for the Challenge are on these three bands. I have a full sized quarter
wave vertical for 160 (and 8 560 ' beverages), a 4 square for 80 and a 9
element M2 at 80' for 6. The station works well and has been productive. But as
you know from 160 propagation is finicky. And for those who have not spent time
on 6, it is even more so there. I rent the RHR stations because they give me
more opportunities to work new ones for the Challenge. It is simply another
tool I use to accomplish my goal. And unless the DXCC rules
change I will continue to do so. I appreciate, and respect, those who feel
this somehow violates the spirit of the DXCC program. I simply do not agree.
Ham radio has always had a prickly relationship with technology. On one hand we
love the cool gadgets and the hobby would die without them. On the other, it
forces us to deal with change. Anyone remember the debate about using packet
clusters to work DX? "Shooting fish in a barrel" was a common criticism of
those who used that technology. Remember when there was a move to ban from DXCC
credit qsos made on a list?
I suspect remote technology is here to stay; the ARRL BOD has already spoken
once on that matter and were quite clear. What I would suggest is view this
technology as simply a tool; available to all willing to pay the fee (just like
our expensive radios, antennas, amps, etc.) . Use it or don't use it. The
choice is yours. Best, Steve, NN4T
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|